![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So since everyone is bawling with reverence over Michael Jackson now that he's dead, does this mean that when O.J. kicks the bucket that everyone will forget that he butchered two people? Will ESPN run retrospectives of his Hertz commercials and reruns of First and Ten?
no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 05:52 pm (UTC)It was a jury trial.
Was not Judge Ito that said no. It was a jury that said so.
God, I hated that period of time, considering I was living in LA then.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 05:53 pm (UTC)My statement stands.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 06:08 pm (UTC)His lawyers were just better than the LA County DA team. That has ALWAYS been my opinion.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 06:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 06:47 pm (UTC)As I recall, MJ was never even accused of killing anyone.
OJ, though... murder, kidnapping, extortion, conspiracy...
Going back to the original point, this is why I don't think OJ will be remembered quite as fondly.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 06:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 07:00 pm (UTC)But it seems you are not acknowledging mine. That there is no comparison between OJ and MJ... really.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 07:08 pm (UTC)I always figured he'd take a powder eventually, I'm just sorry it took this long.
Yes, his music was good. But I never owned any of it because he's one of those people that always gave me a Bad Feeling. Call that prejudice, if you will, but I have fairly good instincts about that kind of shit...comes from experience, sadly.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 07:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 07:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 07:18 pm (UTC)Not to mention all the stealing by the Vatican... (not going to get into a cynic contest with you or anything... just noting I share it)